April 7, 2009
Paid-For-Content?? The Great Debate (of the day, at least)
By Ashley
There has been a lot of buzz lately about whether media organizations should start to charge to view their content. And is the model that will save these companies from going under?
I have two trains of thought on this:
Thought Process Numero Uno: I think back to pre-iTunes days when I would use programs like LimeWire to download ALL of my music for free. The days of buying CD’s were long over for me. Then iTunes came along, and gasssp, they were going to charge for their music. I won’t lie… I boycotted for as long as possible. But then I saw the light… it was SO much easier and convenient to download off of iTunes. I always knew what I was getting and that the quality would be perfect; and on top of it all I was supporting the artists I enjoy.
I think it’s very possible that web-users will ultimately do the same thing with getting their news/videos. Most of us will be rebellious at first but soon enough we will see the light…and the value in getting quality content, and supporting the staff that work so hard to bring us this content. Of course, this all depends on how reasonably priced it will be. If companies are competing with each other for eyeballs, I imagine it will have to be pretty low cost.
Thought Process Numero Dos: Newspapers/Broadcasters will be shooting themselves in the foot if they adapt a paid content business model. Why? Because there will always be ways to find similar, if not the same, content for free so we will never want to pay. Furthermore, according to a Knowledge Networks poll, 80% of online network TV viewers would prefer to view ads in exchange for unpaid video content, up from 67% in 2006. So clearly users will go to some type of extent to avoid paying fees for content. Can the same methodology be applied to a “print” ad before reading any articles? Seems like a plausible scenario.
The Associated Press unveiled rate cuts on Monday to help member newspapers reeling from declining advertising revenue and said it would also sue websites that use its members’ articles without permission. They have been the first to announce such an aggressive plan. I am very curious to see how this plays out, but I know one thing is for sure… I have read a lot of articles about their announcement this week and none of it seems to be positive. Let the foot shooting begin…???
Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: ap, associated press, broadcasters, cable, content, itunes, newspapers, paid — @ 10:32 am
Comments (1)1 Comment »
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL
Leave a comment
Subscribe to our feed
- September Archives
- August Archives
- June Archives
- May Archives
- April Archives
-
March Archives
Social media...it means business.
A Twitter Experiment
Newspapers want a bailout plan?? Say what??!
TFI takes home GOLD at Caples Awards
Today's Match-Up... Twitter vs. SEO
Newspapers are finally catching on (sorta)
Facebook vs. Google
The Factory Interactive takes home the gold at the 2009 ADDY Awards for Germville Campaign
-
February Archives
Are Newspapers Still Relevant?
Everything can be beautiful - Unexpected Inspired Design
SEOtrack™ - Business Development Solutions For Search and Social Media Marketing.
BumpTop - the desktop re-invented
Fictional Ad Personality wins Twitter's First Annual Shorty Awards:
Out with the old...in with the new.
Inspiration: WordPress Customization Examples
SNL's MacGruber likes his Pepsi.
Crowdsourced Doritos spot dethrones Anheuser-Busch's #1 Ad Meter dynasty.
Peta Super Bowl Ad banned from TV - again !
Super Bowl XLIII Ads fail to deliver social media ROI
- January Archives
- December Archives
- November Archives
- Categories
[...] in April, I wrote about newspapers charging for their online content. After reading summaries of The American Press [...]
Pingback by How much will YOU pay to read online news? | The Factory Interactive - The Revolution will be Digitized — June 4, 2009 @ 4:51 pm